Showing posts with label liberals. Show all posts
Showing posts with label liberals. Show all posts

Saturday, February 6, 2010

Odds 'N Ends From Hugh Akston's Diner Today

It's an odd time for liberals to feel smug. But even with Democratic fortunes on the wane, leading liberals insist that they have almost nothing to learn from conservatives. Many Democrats describe their troubles simply as a PR challenge, a combination of conservative misinformation -- as when Obama charges that critics of health-care reform are peddling fake fears of a "Bolshevik plot" -- and the country's failure to grasp great liberal accomplishments. "We were so busy just getting stuff done . . . that I think we lost some of that sense of speaking directly to the American people about what their core values are," the president told ABC's George Stephanopoulos in a recent interview. The benighted public is either uncomprehending or deliberately misinformed (by conservatives).
  • Add @suziplasse to the folks you follow on Twitter...  a relentless female John Galt who, ironically, DOES live under the sign of the $. (Vegas)
  • I sent the following letter on 2/5 to Jennifer Horn, one of the Republican challengers for the New Hampshire 2nd Congressional District seat:
I enjoyed participating in the rally on Tuesday with Stephen Moore at the Marriott Courtyard in Nashua.  The speeches were great and there was a terrific buzz in the crowd.
 
Terrific "stump speech" by you as well!  I took a couple extra copies of the Constitution and gave them to a few friends.  (I sent your campaign a donation this morning of $25 to help defray those costs.)
 
As a concerned citizen, whose interest in your campaign extends only to my unshakeable commitment to see a true conservative assume the seat of the NH 2nd Congressional District in November, I highly, highly recommend that you get connected to the exploding Twitter community.
 
I know what you're thinking, because before this past weekend I harbored the same skepticism you might have (your last tweet on NHJennifer was on 11/3/09).  Is Twitter just a way for people to say they're taking the dog out, or "OMG didja see Lost?"  Quite the contrary. When the history of the 2010 conservative landslide is written, the impact of Twitter will be showcased as the lubricant of the machine that proved to be unstoppable.  The first chapter in that history was written on 1/19 in Massachusetts.
 
This past weekend I attended, with about 500 other concerned conservative grass-roots organizers in NH, a forum at SNHU sponsored by Fred Tausch's Steward for Prosperity focused on the use of social media in organizing grass roots movements. 
 
So, I took the plunge, opened a Twitter account and started "tweeting".  As I saw how the information flowed my jawed dropped in awe at the power that Twitter enables. 
 
Everyday, the movers and shakers of government, conservatism, liberalism and everything in between are using Twitter to shape the messaging of the events of day - effectively emasculating the distorting and destructive power the main stream media has enjoyed and, by which, the liberal monster that we face today sits, nervously, upon Capital Hill.
 
I highly recommend that you get out there on Twitter.  The reach that you will have in a very, very short period of time will be far greater and cheaper than traditional Twitter-less campaigning.  Also, your ability to attract the attention of national-level support, as Scott Brown enjoyed (primarily through Twitter) will be exponentially enhanced.  Every day - every hour  - you will be able to imprint your position on the incredible events of the day and the folks following you will grow every day.  We will know Jennifer intimately because she will have been with us on Twitter every step of the way.
 
I would love the opportunity to speak with you or your staff about this. 
 
Best Regards,
 
Craig Powers
  • Early Morning Thread: How to Destabilize and Destroy a Country, Michael Walsh, Big Journalism.com.   A chilling interview from 1985 with a former KGB agent who details with clinical precision. the four step process for destabilizing and destroying a country:  1.  Demoralize (15 - 20 years); 2. Destabilize (2-5 years:  Focus on economic destabilization, foreign affairs and defense); 3.  Crisis (6 weeks); 4.  "Normalization".  25 years ago, this guy was foreshadowing what we now suffer in 2010.
  • Don't Blame It on Our Coca-Cola Bottles Academy Award winning screenwriter, Paddy Chayefsky on European contempt for Americans from the WWII era movie The Americanization of Emily  Courtesy of @suziplasse



Tuesday, September 22, 2009

NewsBusters

I stumbled onto this website that I found entertaining. Enjoy!

Monday, July 20, 2009

More Pelosi

Here's a lovely piece from San Fran Nan from January of this year... the face and sound of the inherent contradiction in the liberal mind. She blames deficits during the Bush years on the 2003 tax cuts... I guess she forgot to look at the data (what liberal ever does? It just gets in the way of their perception of the world as they would have it.)

Deficits are created when spending exceeds income (slow me down if this is too much "Inside Baseball" stuff). So, when Congress goes on a spending spree during the Bush years, the reason for the deficit has NOTHING to do with spending, soooo, it must have been those Bad Bush Tax Cuts.

But what kind of "take" did the Feds grab in terms of taxes following the Bush tax cuts? Well, according to the IRS' "SOI Tax Stats - Internal Revenue Collections and Refunds...Table I" between 2003 and 2007, Federal receipts (corporate income taxes, individual income taxes, employment taxes [OASDHI, FICA, SEICA, etc], Estate and gift taxes and excise taxes) increased by 45% from a post-9/11 low of $1.65 trillion in FY03 to $2.40 trillion in FY07.

So, imagine in 2003 you found yourself making $85K... four years later, you were making $124K...but were up to your arse in debt. Income problem or a spending problem? Exactly. Put the credit card away and start minding your ass(ets).

The deficit problem, Madame Speaker, finds its root in the amount of spending, not in the amount of tax revenue. But because this inconvenient truth contradicts the liberals view of a world that doesn't respond to incentives, liberals spin TBL ("the Big Lie") and blame tax cuts for the deficit wracked up during the 2003 - 2007 Bush years. (As an aside, don't the Bush deficits look, well, bush league, compared to a REAL spending, uhm, "investing" machine like Pelosi, Reid and Obama?)

By the way, for those of you keeping score, if you really, really, really want to soak the rich and get "them" to pay even MORE money in taxes (by creating wealth, creating jobs from which employment taxes can be generated, and growing the economy) then Washington (and states) should lower tax rates, including capital gains taxes, and make a promise not to mess with the tax code for the next two years... and then watch the gusher of cash generated as tax receipts as we grow our country out of this socialist swamp in which we have been dumped...All we ask from our government is to get the hell out of our way and stay out of our way.

Enjoy the twisted, tortured, contradiction-laced lunacy of the women two heart beats from the presidency...